This is a photo of Krijn's family back in Volendam, circa 1947. His mom is the girl in the lower left hand corner. At that time, Volendamers wore this costume every day. His mom rebelled at age 16 and refused to wear it. Major, major family drama moment! Krijn's grandfather and grandmother (the couple in the center) wore the costume daily for their whole lives. Grandfather died in the mid 70s, Grandmother in 1994.
Saturday, December 13, 2014
Addendum: Krijn's Family from Volendam, Picture from County Archives
This is a photo of Krijn's family back in Volendam, circa 1947. His mom is the girl in the lower left hand corner. At that time, Volendamers wore this costume every day. His mom rebelled at age 16 and refused to wear it. Major, major family drama moment! Krijn's grandfather and grandmother (the couple in the center) wore the costume daily for their whole lives. Grandfather died in the mid 70s, Grandmother in 1994.
Tuesday, December 2, 2014
Last Minute Study Session: Wed at 7:30am in the Cafeteria
Hey all,
I will be in the Cafeteria at 7:30 on Wed morning, if you'd like to prep for the final. I hope to see some of you there.
Take care,
John
I will be in the Cafeteria at 7:30 on Wed morning, if you'd like to prep for the final. I hope to see some of you there.
Take care,
John
Monday, November 24, 2014
Recap of Peer Led Review and Possible Final Exam Questions
Hi all,
Here is a recap of our Peer Led review. Many thanks to Fotoon for her excellent assistance (especially for capturing all the questions and typing them out), and to everyone who attended for your contributions:
Highlights of our discussion:
1) Talked about our papers, and editorial feedback received/things to fix
2)
Talked about presentations and came up with guidelines. Please let me
know if these are not in-line with your expectations: 3-4 minutes, talk
about your interviewee's story, your interviewee's push/pull/means,
which method you used to interview your subject, why you selected your
interviewee, visuals optional (post to blog).
3)
Discussion of possible questions for final exam. We took the chapters
in reverse order, and used questions from the chapter summaries in many
cases. Other questions came from our class discussion notes:
Ch 30: What core beliefs guided Ronald Regan's presidency? (p. 741)
Ch 29: In what was was the 1960s an era of upheavals, and/or an echo of enlightenment ideals? (class discussion)
Ch 28: What are some of the major successes and failures of the civil rights movement, 1961-65?
Ch 27: In what sense were there two Americas? (p. 675)
Ch
26/Class Discussion of Cold War: What is the difference of hot war vs
cold war? How can this be expressed in relation to the World Wars and
the cold war of the 1950s and 1960s?
Ch 25: What were the major effects of WWII on American society, including minorities and women? (p. 624)
Ch 24: None
Ch 23: What developments underlay 1920s mass culture and how did they effect American life and leisure?
Ch 22: None
Ch 21: What strategies did African Americans, women, and industrial workers use to improve their lot in the early 20th Century?
Ch 19: How did Victorian morality shape middle class society and culture?
Ch 18: None
Ch 17: How was the national parks movement related to the western legend? (p. 419)
Ch
14-15-16: How did the newly freed slaves reshape their lives after
emancipation? (p. 382), How did slavery help bring about the Civil War?
Sunday, November 23, 2014
If you missed class last Friday...
Hello everybody,
Happy almost-Thanksgiving Break! FYI, for those who missed our class meeting last Friday, here is the scoop for Monday: Ms. Andrews will be out on Monday, but she has asked me and Fotoon to facilitate a peer- led discussion of our research papers. We will also be talking about the upcoming final, and making a list of suggestions for possible exam questions which we will turn in to Ms. Andrews via e-mail (along with the attendance for Monday).
Hope you are all having a great weekend! If you have questions, please e-mail me at rinaldi_john@yahoo.com
Take care,
John
Happy almost-Thanksgiving Break! FYI, for those who missed our class meeting last Friday, here is the scoop for Monday: Ms. Andrews will be out on Monday, but she has asked me and Fotoon to facilitate a peer- led discussion of our research papers. We will also be talking about the upcoming final, and making a list of suggestions for possible exam questions which we will turn in to Ms. Andrews via e-mail (along with the attendance for Monday).
Hope you are all having a great weekend! If you have questions, please e-mail me at rinaldi_john@yahoo.com
Take care,
John
Saturday, November 15, 2014
Reaction to Civil Rights Primary Source Class Discussion
Growing up in the 1970s, I never had any idea what African American people were still going through, long after slavery ended, well into the 20th Century (and even now). I had no idea how much discrimination there was back then. Looking back now at segregation, and seeing how much hatred was focused on black people by white people makes me feel so sad. That photo of the young girl trying to walk to high school, while a white girl yelled at her, her face a twisted mask of hate, really does freeze-frame that exact moment in history. I am glad to hear that the white woman saw the error of her ways, and apologized. But, I wonder why racism is still such a big problem in this country. I know we have come a long way, and I am grateful, but we still have a long way to go, for sure. Not just in terms of white/black racism, but in terms of all races' views of each other. As we discussed in class, race really is an illusion. I like what Dr. Hamilton said in my Theologies of Liberation class last year: "There is only one race, the human race." Amen to that!
Thursday, November 13, 2014
Civil Rights Era Primary Source
Here is my primary source reading for the Civil Rights Era, a blackmail letter from the FBI to Dr. Martin Luther King, which all but tells him to end his life. It was recently uncovered in the National Archives. You can also click the link below to see the letter.
MLK Letter at NY Times
MLK Letter at NY Times
Tuesday, November 11, 2014
Play About Civil Rights Era: The Party People at Berkeley Rep
Here is the info on "The Party People", a multimedia theater presentation about the Civil Rights Era currently playing at Berkeley Rep. Anyone interested in checking it out????
http://berkeleyrep.org/season/1415/8235.asp?gclid=CIi2jJuO8sECFdGCfgod8VEA9g
Here's the description of the show on the Berkeley Rep web site:
http://berkeleyrep.org/season/1415/8235.asp?gclid=CIi2jJuO8sECFdGCfgod8VEA9g
Here's the description of the show on the Berkeley Rep web site:
Get ready for a hyperkinetic mix of live video,
hip hop, jazz, rock, gospel, blues, Latin rhythms, and spoken word as
the explosive theatre ensemble UNIVERSES rocks and unlocks the radical
and complicated legacy of the Black Panthers and Young Lords. These
seminal activists fought injustice, provided free food and medical care
for their communities—and struggled against a government determined to
suppress them. Based on dozens of interviews, Party People
imagines the Black Panthers and Young Lords reuniting today at an art
opening curated by a couple of young counterculturists, where old wounds
open and generations collide. What is the price of being a
revolutionary, and what happens to those who come after?
Party People was developed in The Ground Floor, Berkeley Rep’s Center for the Creation and Development of New Work.
Sunday, November 9, 2014
Statistics on Undocumented Immigration
Here is a link to a great article about undocumented immigration. I didn't know it had actually slowed down in recent years. This is well written, even-handed, and has a lot of good graphs and information. The research was conducted by the Pew Research Center, a well-known organization that examines complex social issues.
http://www.pewhispanic.org/2014/09/03/as-growth-stalls-unauthorized-immigrant-population-becomes-more-settled/
http://www.pewhispanic.org/2014/09/03/as-growth-stalls-unauthorized-immigrant-population-becomes-more-settled/
Friday, November 7, 2014
Interview Questions and Answers Posted Here
It occurred to me that a really handy way to preserve my interview for our paper on Immigration would be to post it in my blog. It's long, but there is some interesting stuff in here. Primarily, I've posted this so Ms. Andrews can reference it:
John Rinaldi
US History for International Students, Andrews
Oral History Research Project (Immigration)
November 5, 2014
Interview
Questions
Interview Subject: Theodorus Albertus Krijn Mossel
Age: 41
Occupation: Software Solutions Architect
Thank you for agreeing to take part in this oral
history research paper for my US History class. Please answer the questions in writing,
in as much detail as you can.
1.
Where and when were you born?
I was born in a hospital in Amsterdam, The
Netherlands, on February 18, 1973.
2. Tell
me about your hometown. Where is it located? Is it large or small? Is it
provincial or cosmopolitan? What is the nearest big city, and how far away is
it?
I
grew up in Volendam, which is about 15 miles north of Amsterdam. When I was
born, it had about 12,000 inhabitants, and around 20,000 now. Even though it’s
relatively close to Amsterdam, the people’s mindset is very provincial. This is
due to two factors:
-
Since The Netherlands is such a small country, distances
tend to weigh heavier.
-
The town is the only Catholic community in an overwhelmingly
Protestant area. The impact of that is not as heavy as it used to be, but it
has led to the town being fairly isolated in past generations.
The
provincial mindset is reflected in many aspects: the town has a unique dialect,
a very distinctive costume (which was worn every single day in my grandparents’
generation, and only on special occasions now), and almost no one moves away
from the town.
3. Where
and when were your parents born?
My
father was born on July 7, 1935, and my mother on March 20, 1937. Both were
born in Volendam.
4. Do
your parents still live in your hometown?
Yes,
they do.
5. Where
and when were your grandparents born?
My
mother’s parents were both born in Volendam. My father’s birth mother was also
born in Volendam. His biological father is unknown. He was raised by his birth
mother’s aunt and uncle, who were also born in Volendam.
6. Did
your grandparents always live in your hometown?
Yes,
they did (the ones that we know about).
7. How
many aunts, uncles and cousins do you have (approximately)? Do they all still
live in your hometown, or if they have passed away, did they live in your
hometown all their lives?
My
father was an only child, but my mother had 4 sisters and 6 brothers. 3 sisters
and 5 brothers reached adulthood; 2 sisters and 3 brothers are still alive.
They all lived or have lived in Volendam their entire lives.
I
have 20 first cousins (children of my aunts and uncles), 19 of which are still
alive. They all lived or have lived in Volendam their entire lives.
8. Did
your parents or any other relatives go to University?
None
of my parents, grandparents, aunts, uncles, or first cousins (children of aunts
and uncles) went to university. Some of the children of my first cousins have
gone or are going, though.
9. When
you decided to attend university in Amsterdam, what was your parents’ reaction?
And your friends? Were they supportive?
My
parents always wanted me to go to university, since they never had the chance.
Some of my hometown friends also went to university, so they were supportive as
well.
10. Were
you a commuter student, or did you live at school?
I
was a commuter student.
11. What
attitudes have you observed in your hometown about whether or not college is
useful? Would you say that students in your town are encouraged to attend
college, or is it more socially acceptable to go right to work and start making
money?
I
would say that on the one hand, the increased salary that comes with a college
education is regarded positively, but on the other hand, outside ideas such as
science are regarding warily, and starting to earn money as early as possible
is definitely regarded as a virtue. My parents were somewhat unusual in that
they came down firmly in favor of university.
One
anecdote comes to mind: I was visiting one of my older cousins (a daughter of
my mother’s brother), who had a daughter of her own who was nearing college
age. My cousin was telling me that her daughter wanted to go to college very
much, when her husband interjected “I don’t see the point of paying for her
college. She’s just going to get married and never use the education after
that.” This is indicative of the very traditional view of gender roles in
Volendam. The girl did end up going to college; my cousin overruled her
husband.
These
attitudes are slowly changing, though. The youngest generation of adults is
much more outwardly oriented, and some are even moving away.
12. What
is the perception of your hometown in the larger cities in your country? Do you
think it is seen as a hick town? A
snobby suburb? Some other way?
Yes,
Volendam is definitely seen as a hick town. The dialect and old-fashioned
tastes of Volendammers are regularly made fun of on TV. Volendam has a
long-standing tradition of producing popular musicians, leading to a lot of
exposure of the town in Dutch popular culture.
13. What
are the factors that make your hometown different from the rest of the
Netherlands? Please speak to differences in language/dialect, religion, social
mores, etc.
Volendam
started as a ghetto of sorts of the city of Edam. The original community was
very working-class, poor, and Catholic. The Northern half of the Netherlands is
mostly Protestant, so this led to Volendam being quite isolated for several
centuries, both being ignored by outsiders, as well as its inhabitants being
almost exclusively inwardly focused.
Consequently,
the inhabitants developed their own dialect, costume, and culture. The culture
has some elements in common with other traditional European cultures, such as
strictly defined gender roles, different social circles for the genders, gossiping,
and rejection of non-conformists. Some more unique elements are: cleanliness
and industriousness are very highly valued, but the heavy use of alcohol is
accepted, even at an early age.
Another
consequence of the isolation is inbreeding. This was a significant problem even
in the generation of my parents. I count myself lucky that my paternal
grandmother had “loose morals”, and got pregnant out of wedlock (in 1935!), by
an outsider, thus refreshing my genetic heritage. There are only a limited
number of last names in the village, as well as a strong tradition of naming
children after relations. This leads to many people having identical or very
similar names (two of my uncles have the exact same names, first and last).
Volendam has developed an intricate system of inheritable ‘nicknames’, which
are used to distinguish between various branches of a family.
14. How
would you describe your hometown in terms of ethnic and cultural diversity? Are
the people there tolerant of those who are seen as different?
The
town is still very homogeneous, both ethnically as well as cultural. There are
practically no non-Caucasians that live there. Some people have moved there from
outside, though. I have heard of several of these “imported” people, that they
never have felt completely accepted, even after having lived there for decades
and having been married to a local.
There
is not much tolerance of those who are seen as different, although I’ve never
had any negative reactions from people in my cohort when I came out as gay. I
actually received more criticism for moving away than for being gay.
On
the third hand, I think if I’d been more effeminate or transgendered, I would have
faced more difficulty. I “fit in” fairly well, and can “pass” if I need to.
15. What
got you thinking about moving away from your hometown?
Being
gay and being a nerdy only child gave me a natural outsider perspective,
leading to a lot of thinking about other potential communities where I might
fit in better. After starting college, I made friends who shared my
intellectual interests (both at college, and in my hometown), and I felt more
part of a community. That removed the immediate need to move away, which was
also reaffirmed by my parents, who were very much against my moving to
Amsterdam (where my college was). In Volendam, people rarely move away from
home before getting married in their mid-twenties.
16. When
did you first consider the idea of moving to another country?
I
was active on the Internet from 1991 onwards, and became aware of communities
that existed outside of the Netherlands that felt very attractive to me. Such
as the science-fiction and fantasy fandoms, computer science nerds, and the gay
“bear” subculture. Then, in my first job after college, I had the opportunity
to travel a lot to both the UK and the US, and seeing first-hand what they were
like. In addition, I always felt more attracted to popular culture from the UK
and US (music, movies, TV), than those homegrown in The Netherlands.
17. Of
your high school/college friends, did any others move away from your hometown,
or away from the Netherlands? Where did they move?
Of
my high school friends, only one moved “away”, as in to the next town over. Of
my college friends, there were quite a few that moved away from the country,
including one who moved to Singapore by way of Vietnam, and one who moved to
the San Francisco Bay Area.
18. Were
there factors that made you uncomfortable staying in your hometown, or staying
in the Netherlands?
Yes,
being openly gay in my hometown in my generation would have meant being “the
only gay in the village”. I wouldn’t necessarily have been outcast, but I would
have gotten a lot of attention, wanted or not.
As
to the country at large, I never felt comfortable with the paradoxical
Calvinism in Dutch culture. Dutch people like to think of themselves as very
tolerant, but there is considerable social pressure to conform to certain
roles. For example, you can be gay and you can use drugs recreationally. But
“ostentation” in many forms is frowned upon. For example, showing your wealth
is definitely a faux pas, even if you earned it yourself. Also, enjoying food
too much is a no-no. Especially in the gay community, there is pressure to be
very thin.
19. Did
you ever consider moving to any other countries besides the United States?
Yes,
if the opportunity had presented itself, I wouldn’t have minded living in the
UK.
20. What
was it about the US in particular that attracted you?
The
subcultures I mentioned earlier, and especially the culture of technological
development, were attractive to me. Also, individual achievement is celebrated
and stimulated, and you are allowed to enjoy the fruits of your work.
21. Why
did you choose to settle in the San Francisco Bay Area?
It
has a very active and large gay community as well as Silicon Valley. Also, the
company that offered me a job was located there.
22. Did
you come to the US legally? If so, what kind of Visa did you have?
Yes,
I had an H1-B visa, allowing me to change employers, but with a limited
validity.
23. Was
it hard to obtain that visa?
No,
it was arranged by the Dutch company that hired me to work in its San Jose
office.
24. Did
it cost you a lot of money to move?
All
my legal costs for the visa were paid by the company, but I paid for the
travel, and the furnishing of my apartment. I certainly paid less than someone
who moves of their own accord.
25. When
you moved to the US, did you already have a job?
Yes,
I was hired before moving.
26. When
you moved to the US, did you already speak English?
Yes,
I did.
27. When
you moved to the US, what level of education had you completed?
I
got my Master’s Degree in Computer Science in 1997, and moved to the US in
2009.
28. Did
you see your move as being permanent or temporary? If temporary, how long did
you originally plan to stay in the US?
My
original plan was to stay temporarily, based on the H1-B validity timeframe (3
years, extendable to 6), although I liked living in the US so much that I
started dreaming of making it permanent. All of that changed, of course, when I
met my lovely spouse.
29. How
long have you lived in the US?
I
have lived in the US for 5 years and 2 months.
30. Once
you got to the US, how did it compare with your expectations? Describe your
feelings and impressions (positive and negative) during your first year in the
US.
I
had traveled many times to the US before moving, so I was familiar with the
culture. I was worried about making friends and re-building my social web, but
that proved to be very easy, much easier than in The Netherlands. This may be
more because I live in the Bay Area than because of living in the US.
One
negative experience I had in my first year was when I fell afoul of a manager
at the company to which I was contracted. I did not appear to be busy enough,
in his view. I felt as if it mostly a matter of my demeanor being too relaxed,
not culturally appropriate. I was asked to leave that project, but fortunately
didn’t lose my job.
31. Describe
your feelings when the US Supreme Court struck down Proposition 8, so that you
were able to marry your partner.
“Elation”
covers it pretty well, I’d say. We already had a very committed relationship,
but having it legitimized makes me feel much more part of the community. Not to
mention that it opened the door to acquiring permanent residence in the US.
32. What
are the attitudes/laws around gay marriage in your country? In your home town?
Gay
marriage in The Netherlands became legal in 2001, and was not very
controversial. There was some resistance from the ultra-religious, but the
population at large supported it. My impression is that in my hometown a
married gay person is more easily accepted than a single one, perhaps because
people feel less threatened in their own sexuality. A married couple is also
simply more respectable, and it fits better with the life stages of the other
inhabitants.
33. Is
there anything else you’d like to tell me about why you chose to move? How has
your view of the US changed since you have lived here?
When I decided to move, I was at a
point in my life where I didn’t have a lot of ties; my first long-term
relationship had ended two years earlier, and a troubled period dating someone
had just ended. So when the offer came, I was ready to try something new.
I’ve
learned many things about the US that I didn’t know before moving here. One is
the sheer diversity of the country. There are huge cultural differences based both
on geographical region, but also on subculture. This is partly a function of
scale, but I also feel that it is much easier to “be yourself” in the US, it’s
easier to find a subculture in which you fit, and the culture is more
individualistic, and therefore there is less social pressure to conform.
Thank you for sharing your thoughts and impressions
with me!
Sincerely,
John Rinaldi
Monday, November 3, 2014
Movie: Indian 101 (about LaDonna Harris)
Here is a link to the website for the movie I mentioned in our last class, "Indian 101", the story of Commanche activist LaDonna Harris. LaDonna's husband was a US Senator in the 1960s and 1970s. LaDonna was able to use her position in order to shed light on the plight of the Native Americans, Her style was constructive as opposed to confrontational. She remains active today, working to heighten awareness of issues that impact indigenous people all over the world.
http://indian101themovie.com/index.html
The filmmaker, Julianna Brannum, is herself a member of the Comanche nation. Johnny Depp is the executive producer. Indian 101 was recently shown on PBS, is available on DVD, and has also won a number of awards as an entry in film festivals. In fact, it is being shown at 7pm on Monday, Nov. 3, 2014 at the American Indian Film Festival in San Francisco. If I didn't have rehearsal, I would go! More info here:
http://aifisf.com/festival/2014/program/?pno=2
During an interview I heard on National Public Radio last week (which is where I first learned of her, and heard about the movie) I was surprised to hear LaDonna referring to herself as an "Indian". But she also uses the terms "Native American" and "indigenous". Before her husband, Fred was a US Senator, he was a state senator in Oklahoma. LaDonna was frequently at his side (often sitting in as his guest during legislative sessions), and became known for being a favorite hostess. The Oklahoma senators referred to the couple as "the Senator and the Indian", which LaDonna explained was an affectionate nickname that she took as a compliment.
Harris also wrote her memoirs a few years ago. The book is called "LaDonna Harris: A Comanche Life".
If anyone goes to see the film, I'd love to hear your thoughts.
http://indian101themovie.com/index.html
The filmmaker, Julianna Brannum, is herself a member of the Comanche nation. Johnny Depp is the executive producer. Indian 101 was recently shown on PBS, is available on DVD, and has also won a number of awards as an entry in film festivals. In fact, it is being shown at 7pm on Monday, Nov. 3, 2014 at the American Indian Film Festival in San Francisco. If I didn't have rehearsal, I would go! More info here:
http://aifisf.com/festival/2014/program/?pno=2
During an interview I heard on National Public Radio last week (which is where I first learned of her, and heard about the movie) I was surprised to hear LaDonna referring to herself as an "Indian". But she also uses the terms "Native American" and "indigenous". Before her husband, Fred was a US Senator, he was a state senator in Oklahoma. LaDonna was frequently at his side (often sitting in as his guest during legislative sessions), and became known for being a favorite hostess. The Oklahoma senators referred to the couple as "the Senator and the Indian", which LaDonna explained was an affectionate nickname that she took as a compliment.
Harris also wrote her memoirs a few years ago. The book is called "LaDonna Harris: A Comanche Life".
If anyone goes to see the film, I'd love to hear your thoughts.
Thursday, October 9, 2014
Factions Working RIGHT NOW to Curtail Liberty!!!
So, that wacky senator from Texas, Ted Cruz, wants to amend the Constitution in order to set back or derail the cause of marriage equality. He's upset that the recent action (or more correctly, inaction) by the Supreme Court has now brought to 31 the number of states that now perform/recognize same sex marriages. This article in The Atlantic has some pretty scary quotes which show the depths of ignorance and bigotry that still thrive in this country.
http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2014/10/ted-cruz-dissents/381176/
What do you think of using the Constitution to deny freedom to a group of people? Sounds like discrimination to me.
http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2014/10/ted-cruz-dissents/381176/
What do you think of using the Constitution to deny freedom to a group of people? Sounds like discrimination to me.
Tuesday, October 7, 2014
The Federalist Papers #10
In the Federalist Papers #10, Madison writes
eloquently about the dangers of factions within politics. In class, we initially defined
a faction as a subgroup of people who share a common goal. Then, we went on to say that for our purposes in
class, a faction is a subgroup of a political party. For example,
today’s Tea Party is a faction of the larger Republican Party. The members of
the Tea Party are bound together by their extremely-conservative ideology,
which is far to the right of mainstream Republican politics. In class, we also talked about some of the pitfalls
surrounding factions:
1) Factions
are divisive
2) They
create political instability
3) They
can either end up being ignored (if too small/weak) or getting too powerful.
Madison also tells us that there are two ways of
“curing the mischiefs of the faction…the one, by removing its causes; the other
by controlling its effects.” He goes on to explain that removing the causes of
factions requires using one of two strategies:
1) “destroying the liberty which is essential to its existence”
2) or (in a nutshell) telling everyone exactly what to believe.
Of course, Madison finds both of these solutions unacceptable.
Madison then explains that since we can’t really remove the causes of factions,
we are left to try to control its effects.
He goes on to talk about the difference between a
republic and a democracy. A pure democracy “can admit of no cure from tor the
mischiefs of faction."
A republic, by contrast, through use of a document like The Constitution can control the actions of factions through mechanisms like voting and process.
A republic, by contrast, through use of a document like The Constitution can control the actions of factions through mechanisms like voting and process.
Madison points out, and I have to agree, that people love to argue. He also explains that given a lack of anything important to fight about, people will fight about trivial matters.
In getting ready to write my paper, I will say that
Madison was indeed correct in his argument that a well-written Constitution
would be helpful in making sure that factions/special interests are neither squashed,
nor do they become too powerful.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
